Orbital Update

One of the biggest regulatory developments this week came from Canada.

Canada’s regulator, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), published a major update to its debris mitigation licensing framework for satellite operators. The new rules move several debris mitigation principles from guidance into enforceable licensing conditions.

The most important change:

The FCC-style 5-year deorbit expectation is no longer isolated to the United States.

What Changed

Under the updated framework:

  • LEO satellites must deorbit within 5 years after end-of-mission

  • Satellites above 600 km are expected to carry propulsion capability

  • Operators must demonstrate disposal reliability

  • Constellations are expected to achieve near-certain disposal success rates

  • Operators must actively monitor conjunction risks through SSA providers

These are no longer theoretical best practices.

They are becoming operational licensing requirements.

Why This Matters

The important signal is not just the rule itself.

It is the convergence.

The FCC introduced its 5-year disposal rule earlier, and now Canada is aligning in the same direction.

That suggests the industry is entering a new phase where:

  • shorter disposal timelines become standard

  • propulsion becomes expected, not optional

  • debris mitigation becomes continuous operational compliance

For operators, this creates a new challenge:

keeping engineering, licensing, and mission operations aligned as requirements evolve across jurisdictions.

Spectrum Regulation Is Also Shifting

At the same time, the Federal Communications Commission is moving to overhaul satellite spectrum interference rules by relaxing EPFD constraints for NGSO constellations.

That could significantly increase throughput for systems like:

  • SpaceX Starlink

  • Amazon Kuiper

But it also signals something broader:

regulators are simultaneously encouraging constellation growth while tightening sustainability expectations.

What This Means for Mission Teams

Regulatory compliance is no longer a one-time licensing task.

It is becoming an operational layer that affects:

  • mission design

  • propulsion architecture

  • deployment timelines

  • constellation operations

  • end-of-life planning

The operators that adapt fastest will likely be the ones that treat compliance as part of mission operations from day one.

Deeper dive on this issue

Subcribe to the Astrolytics blog

Keep reading